Scoring Methodology
Most dating advice is opinion dressed up as insight. This calculator is different. Every category, every weight, every modifier was built from a specific body of research on what humans actually select for, and why.
This page explains exactly how your score is calculated, what each category measures, and the research foundation behind the weights. Transparency is the point. A score you can't interrogate isn't worth trusting.
The calculator asks 10 questions. Each question has five answer options worth 0 to 4 points. The points are embedded in the answers, unlabeled, so you respond honestly rather than strategically.
Your answers are grouped into categories (Physical Fitness, Confidence, Status, etc.). Each category averages the points from its questions into a category score from 0 to 4. Those category scores are then multiplied by their respective weights and summed into a raw score, which is normalized onto a 1.0 to 10.0 scale.
Age modifiers make a small adjustment to account for the competitive landscape of the age group you're actually in. For men, height carries an additional modifier reflecting its documented role as a physical selection signal.
The 10.0 Rule
A perfect 10.0 requires every category to score 9.0 or above. If even one category falls below that threshold, the maximum overall score is capped at 9.9, regardless of how strong everything else is. A 10.0 should mean genuinely operating at the highest level across all dimensions. One significant gap means there is real work left to do, and the score reflects that honestly.
The overall score has a minimum floor of 4.0. The honesty lives in the category breakdown. A 2.1 in physical fitness or a 1.8 in confidence tells the real story. The overall score is calibrated to keep the conversation on what to build, not how far someone has fallen.
What women actually select for, synthesized from evolutionary psychology and behavioral research
Signals provider capacity and social standing, one of the most documented partner selection criteria across cultures and time periods.
Health, discipline, and physical capability made visible. Both a direct attraction signal and an indicator of long-term investment in self.
Measured through action under uncertainty: whether you express interest directly or wait for guaranteed outcomes. Confidence signals genetic fitness and leadership capacity.
The ability to make others feel seen and heard. Emotional intelligence is a strong predictor of relationship quality and is directly observable in early interactions.
How others describe your follow-through and relentlessness. Drive signals upward trajectory. Future resources matter as much as current ones.
Whether you are building something that matters to you. Purpose and direction are deeply attractive signals of psychological stability and long-term partner potential.
Intentionality in presentation. Lower weight than fitness, but a man who dresses with care signals awareness and discipline that extends to other areas.
Men's scoring also includes an age modifier (±0.1 to ±0.4) and a height modifier (±0.2 to ±0.4) applied to the final normalized score.
What men actually select for, synthesized from evolutionary psychology and behavioral research
The most heavily weighted category for women based on consistent cross-cultural research. Includes self-assessment and behavioral signals like the attention received in social settings.
Energy, physical health, and fitness. Distinct from static physical attractiveness. Vitality is dynamic and improvable at any age.
How others experience being around you. The ability to create connection and make people feel at ease is one of the most powerful long-term attraction forces.
The capacity to receive and respond from ease rather than control. Research on relationship dynamics consistently shows polarity, specifically the tension between masculine and feminine energy, as a driver of sustained attraction.
Stability, groundedness, and whether your life is in a place where a relationship can actually thrive. Chaos in this category undermines every other strength.
Direction and purpose. Lower weight than for men, but a woman with clear vision and momentum adds a dimension of substance that elevates long-term partner quality.
Women's scoring includes an age modifier only (±0.2 to ±0.7). No height modifier is applied.
The category weights are synthesized from evolutionary psychology research conducted across dozens of cultures over several decades. The core finding is consistent: the traits that drive partner selection are not culturally invented. They are rooted in biological signals that humans have evolved to read and respond to, often below conscious awareness.
For men, the dominant selection signals center on resource acquisition, physical health, and social intelligence, traits that historically correlated with the ability to protect and provide. For women, the dominant signals center on physical health indicators, warmth, and energy, traits that historically correlated with reproductive vitality and pair-bond quality.
The behavioral cross-check questions, like workout frequency rather than just a self-assessment of fitness, exist because research consistently shows a gap between how people perceive themselves and how they actually behave. A question about what you did in the last 30 days is harder to inflate than a question about how you see yourself.
The age and height modifiers are calibrated to reflect documented patterns in the research, not to penalize or reward. They are the smallest component of your score. Strong performance in the behavioral categories outweighs any modifier.
Citation language throughout this calculator reads “synthesized from evolutionary psychology and behavioral research” rather than citing specific studies by name. This is intentional. The weights represent a synthesis across multiple research bodies, not a direct mapping from any single paper. If you want to explore the underlying research, the work of evolutionary psychologists studying human mate preferences across cultures is a useful starting point.
Dating market value (DMV) refers to the specific traits and signals that influence how you are perceived as a romantic partner. It is not a measure of your worth as a person. It is a diagnostic of the attributes that evolutionary psychology and behavioral research consistently show drive attraction and partner selection. Understanding your score gives you a clear picture of where you stand and exactly what to build.
No self-assessment tool is perfectly accurate, but this one is designed to be honest rather than flattering. The category weights are derived from patterns observed across evolutionary psychology research conducted in dozens of cultures over several decades. The behavioral cross-check questions (like workout frequency) are included specifically because self-perception and behavior often diverge. The result is a directionally accurate score that identifies your real leverage points, not a score engineered to make you feel good.
Yes, and significantly. The category breakdown on your results page shows exactly which areas are holding your overall score down. Physical fitness, confidence, style, and social intelligence are all trainable. Status and resources improve over time with deliberate career focus. The Coaching Multiplier on your results page shows a projected score after 90 days of focused work with Maxximus. Most people have one or two categories that, once improved, move their overall score by a full point or more.
Height is included as a modifier for men because research consistently documents it as one of the strongest physical signals women use in initial partner assessment, operating largely below conscious awareness. It is not included for women because the research does not show the same consistent pattern of men using female height as a primary selection signal. The modifier is relatively small (+0.4 at the top end) and is outweighed by behavioral categories. A shorter man who scores highly on confidence, status, and social intelligence will outscore a tall man who scores low on those dimensions.
The age modifiers reflect documented differences in how the dating market values age for each gender. For men, the mid-30s to mid-40s often represent a peak in the combination of status, resources, and presence, so the modifier slightly favors that range. For women, research consistently shows that the signals associated with youth and vitality (energy, health, physical condition) are weighted more heavily by men in partner selection, and these signals naturally shift with age. These modifiers are small adjustments to your raw score. They do not override strong performance in the behavioral categories.
Your category breakdown is more valuable than your overall score. The overall score tells you where you stand. The category breakdown tells you why, and what to do about it. A man with a 6.8 overall score and a 4.1 in confidence has a very different path forward than a man with the same overall score and a 4.1 in status/resources. The category with your lowest score is always your highest-leverage starting point, because it is the constraint limiting your overall number.
Most dating quizzes are designed to make you feel good or to drive engagement with flattering results. This calculator was built to be accurate first. The category weights are grounded in research rather than intuition. The answer options include behavioral cross-checks (not just self-perception). The scoring formula is published transparently on this page. And the results connect directly to specific coaching work, not just a score you screenshot and forget.
The floor exists because the calculator is a coaching tool, not a judgment. A score below 4.0 communicates despair rather than a starting point. The honesty lives in the category breakdown. If your physical fitness score is a 2.1 and your confidence is a 1.8, those numbers tell the truth. The overall score is calibrated to keep the conversation focused on what to build, not how far someone has fallen.
A perfect 10.0 requires every category to score 9.0 or above on the 10-point scale. If even one category falls below that threshold, the maximum overall score is capped at 9.9, regardless of how strong the other categories are or what the age modifier adds. This is intentional. A 10.0 should mean genuinely operating at the highest level across all dimensions. One significant gap means there is still real work to do, and the score should reflect that honestly.
No. The calculator runs entirely in your browser. Your answers, your score, and your category breakdown are never sent to a server, stored in a database, or shared with anyone. When you close the page, the data is gone. The only thing that leaves your browser is if you choose to share your score card, and that is entirely your choice.
Ready?
Your score is waiting. Takes 2 minutes. Get a shareable score card at the end.
GET MY SCORE →